Opposition will back amended ETS Abbott

Sky News

The federal opposition will support Labor’s ETS if all of the proposed amendments to the bill are agreed to, says coalition frontbencher Tony Abbott.

Liberal Senate leader Nick Minchin last week said there was no guarantee a brokered deal on the carbon pollution reduction scheme (CPRS) – also known as the ETS – would win the backing of the party room.

Mr Abbott however said there would be support if all of the coalition’s amendments, including the exclusion of agriculture from the scheme, were agreed to.

‘We’ve put up some very very big amendments and if the government is serious about getting their bill passed they will give us what we want,’ he told Fairfax Radio.

The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder – Trailer

Flu Shot Disabled Beautiful Cheerleader – (Dystonia Disorder)

Is Obama Poised to Cede US Sovereignty?

Visibility 9-11 Welcomes Dr. Frank Legge, PhD – Australian Scientist

Visibility 9-11 Welcomes Dr. Frank Legge, PhD

This episode of Visibility 9-11 welcomes Dr. Frank Legge, PhD to the program.  Dr. Legge is a chemist and serves as a co-editor at the Journal of 9-11 Studies.  He has contributed many essays and papers on the topic of September 11th, including his role in the peer reviewed article titled Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9-11 World Trade Center Catastrophe.  

This interview focuses on Dr. Legge’s new essay is titled What Hit the Pentagon? and is published in it’s latest version (v.5) at the Journal of 9-11 Studies.  This essay’s leading hypothesis states that:

The major hypothesis is that various groups within the 9/11 truth movement are strongly asserting contradictory views and hence weakening the credibility of the movement as a whole.  The damage is exacerbated if the supporters of these views not only disagree but also attack one another.

Dr. Legge also includes a minor hypothesis which says:

The minor hypothesis of the paper is that there is no scientific proof that a Boeing 757 did not hit the Pentagon.

Both hypotheses are examined as well as the idea that the “no plane at the Pentagon” theory is a booby trap for the entire movement.  This idea states that if members of the 9-11 movement continue to promote this “no  plane” theory as fact, that as our efforts become increasingly mainstream, we run the risk of the government producing a video of AA 77 actually hitting the Pentagon.  We know the government has many videos which they have deliberately withheld from the public.  What little information we have been given through official channels has only fueled the “no plane” argument.  If a video were released tomorrow, it is suggested that this would thrust the entire movement into disarray as well as be used in the media to discredit us and irrevocably damage our credibility.

Also of importance in Dr. Legge’s essay is the section on The Precautionary Principle.  We at Visibility 9-11 endorse this approach and caution listeners and visitors to do your homework and only present to the public that information which is solidly documented or backed up by scientific research.

Lastly, is a brief mention of the fine work of John Bursill in hosting 4 events in Australia and New Zealand during the month of November.  The Hard Evidence Tour Down Under 2009 will feature my guest Dr. Legge as well as other solid and reputable members of the movement, and providing to the public only the best evidence we have.  Thanks to John Bursill for pulling together such a fine line-up and for setting a great example for everyone to follow when it comes to bringing to the public only that information which can be solidly proven.  If you want to help with the costs associated with these conferences, which are largely being funded by John himself, please send an email to johnbursill@gmail.com.

Fox News Censors Swine Flu Vaccine Truth

Mercury In Australian Approved H1N1 Vaccine

Tuesday, Sept 22nd, 2009
http://www.prisonplanet.com/mercury-in-australian-approved-h1n1-vaccine.html

From a Prisonplanet reader:

Dear Alex and Crew…

I have been doing some research on the ingredients in the vaccines that are being produced for Australia.

The T.G.A. which is the Australian equivalent of the F.D.A. have approved a vaccination for production and you can read about this here:

http://www.tga.gov.au/alerts/medicines/h1n1vaccine.htm

The link below is for the company that has been allowed to produce the vaccine being licensed to do so by the T.G.A.

http://www.csl.com.au/s1/cs/auhq/1187378853299/news/1249870443804/prdetail.htm

I downloaded the product information from this page here is below is a direct link:
http://www.csl.com.au/docs/833/508/Panvax%20H1N1%20PI.pdf

Upon investigation I see that thiomersal is in the vaccine for the ‘multi dose’ vial.

For those that don’t know this is a definition of what thiomersal is:

Thiomersal (INN) (C9H9HgNaO2S), or sodium ethylmercurithiosalicylate, commonly known in the United States as thimerosal, is an organomercury compound (approximately 49% mercury by weight) used as an antiseptic and antifungal agent.
( source http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thiomersal )

Mercury In Australian Approved H1N1 Vaccine 290509banner

The pdf from CSL the producers of the vaccine has this list of ingredients:

“Each 0.5 mL dose contains, nominally: sodium chloride 4.1 mg, sodium phosphate –
dibasic anhydrous 0.3 mg, sodium phosphate – monobasic 0.08 mg, potassium
chloride 0.02 mg, potassium phosphate – monobasic 0.02 mg, calcium chloride
1.5 μg and thiomersal 50 μg (for multi-dose vial presentation only).”
( source http://www.csl.com.au/docs/833/508/Panvax%20H1N1%20PI.pdf )

This is 50 micrograms per 0.5ml dose.

What are the Australian Environmental Protection Agency mercury environmental guidelines?

Australian Water Quality Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Waters: (ANZECC, 1992):
Maximum of 0.0001 mg/L (i.e. 0.0000001 g/L) (NB this is PER LITRE!!)
( source: http://www.npi.gov.au/database/substance-info/profiles/53.html#comparison )

0.0001 milligrams = 0.1 micrograms / Litre

To get the 0.5ml dose value you would divide this by 2000
because there is 1000ml in a litre therefore

0.1 / 2000 = 0.00005 micrograms per 0.5ml

The difference between EPA standards for what is considered dangerous for mercury in a liquid and the amount that appears in a single vaccine dose is staggeringly then is :

50 – 0.00005 = 49.99995
49.99995/0.00005 = 999999
999999 x 100 = 99999899.99999999%

99999899.99999999% difference !!!???

This means that it is 99999899.99999999% stronger than what is considered dangerous in an environmental exposure.

Anyone with even a 1/10th of a clue can see that there is something wrong there.

If you can’t please line up and take the shot.

Learn more about mercury poisoning here:
http://www.epa.gov/mercury/effects.htm

The NYC CAN March Videos

Jon Gold – 9/11 Blogger

We had a good turn out for a rainy Sunday afternoon. I’m sorry that I didn’t get Bob McIlvaine’s speech, and the others, but I’m sure someone else did. Thanks to everyone that came out today, and thanks to Damon Bean for helping me to film the event.

NYC CAN March – 9/27/2009

NYC CAN March: 9/11 Family Member Manny Badillo

NYC CAN March: Mark Crispin Miller

NYC CAN March: Daniel Sunjata

NYC CAN March: Jon Gold

Wearechange schools Pittsburgh police on constitution at G20

Remember 9/11: Ask questions, demand answers